The November draw was held today, Thursday 4th. Thanks go to Win who made the draw. Number 76 was drawn first winning Rebecca £53 and numbers 27 and 24 both worth £26.50 each means that cheques are on their way to Julie and Les.

Next month all subscriptions will go into the prize pot which will double the value of the prizes to be won. There are numbers available and if you wish to be entered into the December bonus draw go to the 100 Club webpage to download or print an application form. To qualify for the bonus draw you are asked to subscribe for 3 months.

The teenage climate activist, Greta Thunberg, spoke before the current climate meeting about her fears, most notably that all we would hear would be “blah, blah, blah”; the sound of talking to mask the lack of any action. As a person who hates meetings, I have some sympathy with this view. One of the great advantages of the current fashion for meetings held by computer is that I can join, then switch my camera and microphone off and do something more productive, or at least more enjoyable, with my time. However, I am also aware that it is only by hearing others speak that I can begin to understand their views, to hear their arguments and perhaps see my own position in a new light. On a PCC, the most valuable comment is often “Yes vicar, but have you thought about….”. The Bible has accounts of what seem to be have been very lively meetings. Perhaps some of the best are where God seems to be having an argument with someone praying to him; not always getting the better of the exchange and so changing his mind. Words can be blah, blah blah if one, or all parties to a conversation do not listen to what is being said, but they also have immense power to transform if they are properly heard. That is the pattern we see in the Bible and perhaps is what we have also witnessed in Glasgow this week.

Not, until this afternoon, I don’t think I had read Habakkuk either; in fact if you had asked me if there was a book bearing his name in the Bible, I might have struggled to give an honest answer. He is what is known as a “minor prophet” and the name says it all. It is a short book, buried in the middle of the Old Testament surrounded by other books that rarely get read.

The book was written in response to a great catastrophe that was about, or had just, befallen the Jewish nation; probably the destruction of Jerusalem. But Habakkuk did not just see this as the fall of a city or even a nation; he saw it as the destruction of all of creation, the end of the natural world;

“Though the fig tree does not bud and there are no grapes on the vines, though the olive crop fails and the fields produce no food, though there are no sheep in the pen and no cattle in the stalls”

In spite of this, he had hope:

“yet I will rejoice in the Lord, I will be joyful in God my Saviour. The Sovereign Lord is my strength;  he makes my feet like the feet of a deer, he enables me to tread on the heights.”

Habakkuk had faith, that God would provide the resources for his people to rise again.

Today, his fears sound particularly appropriate for the climate crisis we are facing, where trees do not bud, crops fail and livestock dies. But just as in the days of Habakkuk, God does not abandon us. As in those days, he gives us resources, human ingenuity to devise solutions. But just as in the days of Habakkuk, this relies on us taking advantage of those resources.

Each year St Mary’s supports charities near and far. Singawenza was our ‘faraway charity’ in South Africa. Do read the letter of thanks below that we received to thank the congregation of St Mary’s for their generosity.

Letter of thanks Singawenza

The news last weekend was dominated by the murder of Sir David Amess, the MP killed during a routine meeting with constituents. This brought back memories of a few years ago, the killing of Jo Cox, another MP. Both lost their lives by simply doing their job, as elected representatives of us all.

Politics thrives on debate and argument. MPs can expect to be criticised for the views they hold; on occasions it may be appropriate to offer personal criticism, if for example, they say one thing and do another. But, from what I can see, this is uncommon; most MPs have integrity. What we (and they) should not do is to use language that degrades their humanity; I worry when I hear words such as “scum” or glib judgements that “they are all the same”. They are not; each is a human; in Christian terms, a unique person in the image of God.

From a book I have recently read, I understand that in Zulu, “sawubona” is a greeting; its meaning covers seeing and recognising a fellow human. The response “shiboka” can be translated “I exist for you”. The authors of the book make the point that when a Benedictine monk meets another person, the monk bows to face the ground; this is an acknowledgement both that God is within that person and that they and the person they have met share the same earth. These truths apply to all we meet, whatever we may think of them.

In recent days, Israel and Jewish identity has been in the news. The main headlines have been for the author Sally Rooney, who refused to allow her Israeli publisher to translate her latest novel into Hebrew, because she felt it did not dissociate itself from the actions of the Israeli government. But, as a university teacher, what I noticed was that Bristol University has dismissed one of its professors for harassing Jewish students.

There can be difficulties in opposing the actions of any government without targeting all those who live in that country. It would be wrong of me to comment on the specifics of these cases as I do not know the full facts. But I am uncomfortably aware that all too often the Christian Church has been complicit in acts of discrimination, particularly against Jews, on the totally spurious basis that they somehow killed Jesus. Jesus lived and died a Jew; the first Christians considered that they were Jewish. As Christians, we accept the authority of the Old Testament, the Jewish bible. There can never be any excuse for anti-semitism. It was not the Jews who killed Jesus, it was a religiously-minded mob, orchestrated by their priests. And, as a priest, that is an uncomfortable truth I have to face whenever I put on my dog collar.

The well attended Harvest Festival was held last Sunday. The church was decorated beautifully and the service highlighted the work of the two charities that the church is supporting this year. As part of the service David spoke of the work of the Shropshire Rural Chaplaincy Service that provides a variety of support to members of the local rural community and Bonnie made a presentation highlighting the work of Singawnza , a South African based charity that provides sustainable early years education within disadvantaged communities. All produce collected was donated to the Bridgnorth Food Bank.

Ellen’s coffee morning held on Saturday was a huge hit and well attended by residents of Billingsley. Everyone present enjoyed good company and excellent refreshments. Ellen worked tirelessly beforehand to bake amazing cakes and was supported by many willing volunteers. The event also raised in excess of £400 which will go towards the work of St Mary’s Church.

This time of year is always of interest to me, as it marks the announcement of the Nobel Prizes. Yet again, inexplicably, I’ve not had the phone call from Stockholm… But I take some reflected glory from, over the years, having met/known prize winners and on one occasion, actually publishing with one. I’ve also met a number of people who fall into the category of “why-have-they-not-been-given -Nobel-prizes”; the judgement of the committee is always subjective and I suspect had one person been able to give better lectures, he would have had a prize.

This fleeting acquaintance with scientific greats has made some mark on me. It has shown me what a really great intellect looks like; an important lesson in humility for myself and a useful guide for identifying those who think they have a first-rate mind but actually don’t. The people I have met also have another characteristic. Not all scientists are noted for their modesty; sometimes you have to take this side of their personality alongside the merits of their work. However, the Nobel laureates (and the near-misses) that I have known do not have this edge. Perhaps I have been fortunate, but they have all been modest and thoughtful individuals. Whilst I do not think any would consider themselves remotely “religious”, they may have grasped that compared to the wonders of the natural world, or what I would loosely term “creation”, personal humility is the only appropriate response.